Evidence and safety boundaries for TCM content
Our evidence and review requirements: no constitution diagnosis from birth charts and no unreviewed clinical advice.
Current scope
This page explains editorial boundaries. It offers no constitution diagnosis, disease screening, medication, acupuncture or treatment plan. No credential-verified named professional reviewer is currently listed, so pending material is not labelled expert-approved.
History is separate from clinical evidence
A historical source does not by itself demonstrate a treatment effect. A health claim needs a clear population, intervention, comparison, outcome, study quality and uncertainty. Birth times, elements and charts cannot establish disease risk or a constitution diagnosis.
Requirements for future publication
Health content requires a relevant credential-verified professional reviewer, identified authorship and review, sources, intended population and revision history. Unreviewed questionnaires, seasonal prescriptions and personal clinical services are not offered here.
Personal health questions
Consult a qualified health professional. Cultural study and chart output cannot determine whether to start, stop or change treatment. This page collects no health answers and does not send birth-chart users into a diagnosis flow.
Sources and further checks
NIH NCCIH: TCM research, evidence and safetyMaintained by the Fateverse project content team. This page explains the current calculation rules and traditional sources; it has not received an independently named professional review. Updated 27 October 2026. Compare the linked calculation records before relying on a boundary case.